Peoples’ destinies at the mercy of
false reports
Dr
Bouthaina Shaaban
The
rumors spread by Israeli president Shimon Peres in his statement to
Mossad-linked media outlets about a Syrian role in providing Hezbollah with
Scud missiles and the official American reaction to these rumors bring to mind
the spectacle of Colin Powell, who served under both war makers, Bush senior
and Bush junior, in the UN Security Council in 2003. He held a small glass container and claimed
in front of the whole world that biological weapons the size of that container
would endanger the lives of millions, that there was no doubt that Iraq was
deceiving international inspectors and that the United States’ patience with
Iraq was over.
I
recall Security Council meetings in February 2003, when the then French Foreign
Minister, Dominique de Villepin made his famous
speech in defense of extending the mandate of international inspectors. When former international U.N. weapons
inspector Hans Blix asked for six more months to complete inspections and
provide the final findings to the Security Council. He gave evidence that Iraq was cooperating
fully in facilitating inspections and affirmed that the mission was capable of
completing its work in six months.
I
remember how a number of European foreign ministers said, without the slightest
sense of responsibility, that the system was no longer acceptable, even for
days, that Saddam has been deceiving them for over twelve years and that the
international community should put an end to that deception. I was in the Security Council hall hosting
those historic meetings, looking at their faces and knowing that they were
absolutely certain that they were mouthing lies and that they were using
legitimate fear of nuclear weapons as a pretext to launch war on Iraq, destroy
it and return it to the Middle Ages, as James Baker told Iraqi Foreign Minister
Tareq Aziz in January 1991.
Here we
are, more than seven years after those Security Council meetings, and after a
devastating war in which Bush and his clique of neo-conservatives were
responsible for killing over a million unarmed civilians in Iraq. Now that Powell has left the public stage and
became capable of telling the truth about what he knew and believed then, he
acknowledges that what he told the Security Council was not true. Some people see in this ‘a virtue’ indicating
the greatness of democracy instead of bringing to account those responsible for
fabricating those lies.
Now,
days after Shimon Peres unleashed his lie, one of his ministers hastened to
repeat Baker’s threats about Israeli attacks to destroy Syria’s bridges, roads,
power generation plants and “returning it to the stone age”. The media also caught the lie and promoted it
during the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington two weeks ago. The statement is a stark lie, and merits
derision rather than a response. Scud
missiles are tens of meters long; and every missile needs a huge truck to carry
it. Moreover, a small country like
Lebanon in whose airspace reconnaissance drones fly on a daily basis, cannot hide them.
Moreover, technical experts know that launching a Scud needs time and
effort and collective work which is not compatible
with the type of battles in which Hezbollah engages in its defense of Lebanon
against Israeli attacks.
The
mere circulation of this lie raises doubts about its objectives. Without bothering to ask Israel to provide
any evidence of its allegations, Assistant Secretary of State Geffrey Feltman
said it would be an "incendiary,
provocative action" if it turned out to be true; and that the United
States has a "full range of tools" available to make Syria reverse any
delivery of ballistic missiles to Hezbollah.
Two
American representatives put forward a draft resolution to tighten sanctions
against Syria. Representatives Eliot
Engel, D-N.Y., and Mark Kirk, R-Il, known for their
extreme hostility to Arabs, said in a statement that providing Hezbollah with
these missiles “destabilizes the Middle East and is an existential threat to
Israel and the independence of Lebanon”.
Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S expressed deep concern about reports of
certain missiles being transferred to Syria and the possibility of then
transferring them to Hezbollah. She saw
in sending an ambassador to Syria “a tool that we believe can give us extra
leverage, added insight, analysis, information with respect to Syria’s actions
and intentions”. She pointed out
Washington’s “long list of areas that we have discussed with the Syrians, and
we intend to continue pushing our concerns” which include
hosting Palestinian radicals and feeding the violence in Iraq. The statements of Clinton, Feltman and the
two representatives are parrot repetitions of statements made by Netanyahu and
other Israeli extremists about Syria without bothering about the possibility
that these lies will be blown off in the future.
It is
clear that the Scud lie and the parrot statements came to cover for the failure
of the Obama administration to face the intransigent Netanyahu government which
rejected all American calls to stop settlement or move towards just and
comprehensive peace. At this particular
time the Scud lie was fabricated in order to divert attention from the truth
which has become abundantly clear: Israel is the only obstacle to peace in the
Middle East. It also came to undermine
the positive developments achieved in the Syrian American relations under the
Obama administration. Sine Obama became
president, and whenever he made a real and sincere effort to improve relations
with the Muslim world through normalizing relations with Syria and defending
justice in Palestine, the Israelis come out with a story either of ‘allowing
terrorists to enter Iraq’ or ‘feeding Palestinian extremism’ or arming
Hezbollah, in order to put an end to any real development of these relations.
The
world realizes now that Israel is the enemy of peace in the Middle East. It promotes barbaric wars against the Arabs
and prevents achieving any stability in the relations between the United States
and the Arab and Muslim worlds.
Extremist Israelis and their allies in the United States invent lies
which lead to war and human suffering.
They are responsible for tarnishing the image of the United States,
shedding the blood of its soldiers and wasting its money on wars against the
Muslim world. They are responsible for harming both the American people and the
peoples of our region by promoting such naked lies.