Mass Graves for Piles of Lies
Dr. Bouthaina
Shaaban
When Israel has proven its aggressive nature to the whole world, when
the savagery of its wars against its neighbors for over sixty years and the
blockade it is imposing on unarmed civilians in Gaza have been exposed, and
when its government has shown the extent of its extremism, the United States
embarked on an effort to start negotiations of any kind between Israel and the
Palestinians. It is acknowledged by
everyone that these negotiations are not based on a clear frame of reference,
particularly in relation to Jerusalem and the return of the refugees. This is meant as a cover to the policies of
those who launched the war on Gaza and have never stopped robbing the
Palestinians of their land, destroying their homes and killing their
children. Netanyahu’s extremism is such
that he wants to give a religious Jewish interpretation to the ethnic cleansing
of Arab East Jerusalem.
These negotiations exclude an important section of the Palestinian
people and dismember Palestinian existence as a result of Jewish settlements
and the destruction of Arab houses.
Despite the various obstacles Israeli officials created for the
negotiations, the one issue which all Israeli authorities insisted on with the
US special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, was “solving security
problems”. A statement made by Shimon
Peres said that settling security issues is “of paramount importance”, and
repeating the alleged missile story.
This security thesis repeated by Israelis on every occasion is an
elaborate and deliberate attempt to mislead public opinion about the truth of
what is going on in Palestine in terms of massacres and ethnic cleansing. The repetition of the same words by American
officials is part of this misleading process to hide Israeli savagery. The fact is that Palestinians’ security and
Middle East security in general are threatened every day by a force supplied
with all kinds of American weapons, including missiles, German nuclear submarines
and the latest American means of destruction in order to be used by Israel’s
generals to kill more Arab civilians.
This is what Obama did when he asked the US Congress to earmark over $
200 billion to provide Israel with a new arms system to scale up its
aggressions against its neighbors and undermine Middle East stability. Foregrounding security aims in essence to
persist in this process of deception to obscure the savagery of Israeli
occupation, the illegitimacy of Jewish settlements, the atrocities of
deliberately killing civilian Palestinians, destroying their homes, desecrating
their sanctities and burning and Judaizing mosques. At the same time, Israelis and their allies
carry on with their mantra on commitment to the protection of “Israel’s
security”, while sticking the label of terrorism to simple unarmed reactions to
Israeli crimes against the indigenous population.
Let us imagine for a moment that the mosque burned down by Jewish
settlers in southern Nablus was an Israeli synagogue burned by Muslims! Imagine the amount and speed of denunciations
the highest ranking officials in Europe and the United States would have made
against the ‘brutality of the act and its violation of the values of tolerance,
human rights, democracy, etc.
This absolute bias against the Arab victim, not recognizing the pain and
suffering of Palestinians, and burying these pains in the massive graveyard of
a blackout is the result of decades of Western propaganda for Zionism first
against Bolshevism, then against communism, then against Arabs and now against
millions of Muslims in general. All the
promises made to grant Arab Palestine to Zionists, all the intricacies which
preceded and followed the holocaust, and then all the manipulation of these
interactions have been aimed at liquidating the rights of the Palestinian
people to their land and history.
But in recent years some facts started surfacing on top of these mass
graves of real information, particularly when blind official Western support of
Zionism resulted in tragedies which affected millions of innocent civilians in
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. It also
damaged even the security and vital interests of the American people. In more than one place, there have been
attempts to put an end to this grave injustice which uses a massive media
machine spreading blindness all over the world.
J street was launched in the United States on
October 25, 2009 and in Europe on May 4, 2010.
Despite the fact that it has Israel’s interests at heart, it does not
support the crimes of Israel’s generals and their thirst for genocide. It supports Palestinians’ right to
establishing their independent state.
Some international bodies have also started to call for prosecuting
Israeli war criminals. Talking about Israel
is no longer the taboo it used to be.
Although this is only a minor shift, but it is a significant improvement
on the way things were two decades ago.
In this context, the meeting Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev, held
with Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal angered the Apartheid leaders of Israel who
rejected a call from Medvedev and Turkish President Abdullah Gul for Hamas’
participation in the peace process raising the question whether Russia is
taking a position “in support of Islam” (see Yedioth Ahronoth, 13 May
2010: “Russia moving closer to Hezbollah too”.
This interpretation implies an accusation to anyone who believes in the
right of the Palestinian people to freedom of supporting Islam and Hezbollah,
i.e. terrorism. This misleading campaign
against Islam and Muslims aims at diverting attention from Israel’s crimes in
Palestine and the crimes committed against civilians in Iraq and still being
committed in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
If a country the size of Russia has taken this courageous decision to
stress the importance of the unity of the Palestinian people for achieving just
and comprehensive peace in the Middle East, this means there is a fundamental
change which has started to emerge. It
means that the dark epoch of blind Western support to Israeli crimes is almost
over and that some sense is returning to the world conscience.
Russia’s offer to provide Syria with peaceful nuclear energy and signing
an agreement with Turkey to build nuclear reactors means that intimidation and
blackmail are no longer effective.
Putting Israel’s nuclear capacity on the agenda of the IAEA meeting next
June means that the world is really fed up with the arrogance of a criminal
occupying force hostile to peace and a violator of international law. It is an indication that the process towards
achieving real international justice and giving a fair deal to the Palestinian
people has started slowly but surely.