Dominating the Earth
Dr Bouthaina Shaaban
Ahmad
Mughrabi’s article in the Arabic daily al-Hayat,
18 August 2009, “Satellites and Geographical Positioning Systems in the Big
Powers’ Scramble for Dominating the Earth” speaks about the competition in
space, particularly in the field of using satellites for getting a deeper and
more comprehensive view of the earth.
The website of the American Union of Concerned Scientists reveals that
satellites send 80 thousand views of the earth from outer space every day. These views include infra-red videos of the
movement of wind, sea waves and other things.
We
can just imagine the huge amount of information pouring down from outer space
and consequently the amounts of money international interests pay to develop
these satellites. It is not in vain that
the great powers compete to launch satellites, improve their performance and
possess knowledge about space which enables them to put these satellites to use
in order to achieve dominance in this field.
In
this context, it is useful to recall George W. Bush’s famous statement that
“conflict over the earth has moved to space”.
The global conflict between the superpowers over deploying satellite
networks constitutes an entry point to thinking about this global dominance.
Dominating
the earth is the central issue under which come all the causes of wars
including occupation, colonial plunder under different kinds of slogans, like
‘war on terrorism’, ‘freeing the Iraqi people form Saddam Hussein’, ‘empowering
Iraqi women’, dismantling mass destruction weapons which, events have proven,
do not exist in Iraq, controlling the Nile’s water sources under pretexts like
reviewing agreements, creating the Darfur problem
between Arabs and Africans who have for ages shared land, resources, poverty
and the gifts of nature.
But
in order to provide a convincing logic and a facade consistent with the media
campaign which adopts the concept of the civilized and law-abiding West, the
wars waged to control the earth take a cover consisting of rights, security and
combating terrorism which has been exclusively assigned to Islam. Thus, these acts remain in harmony with the
image of the civilized West and do not expose the real goals which, if
uncovered, show the real hostility against peace-loving peoples, the greed for
their land and resources as the main driving force for military action,
political blackmail, and economic sanctions imposed by the victorious states in
World War II against countries which are still struggling to consolidate their
real independence.
The
clearest conflict over land is in Palestine where occupation forces have, for
the past sixty years, expropriated Palestinian land, piece after piece, one archeological
monument after another, one village after another, and one house after
another. Today it is Judaizing
places and changing their names in order to change the place once and for all. Israel
refuses categorically to discuss the ownership of land
despite the fact that Palestinians still possess the keys of the homes they
were expelled from by settlers and still hold to the title deeds of the land
which their ancestors owned for thousands of years.
As
a cover for this policy, Israel has invented the
myth of religious conflict and anti-Semitism, and recently after 9/11 focused
on the danger of Islamic extremism and Israel ’s need for security. It is as if Jewish extremism which manifests
itself in expelling people from their homes and bringing settlers from all
parts of the world to replace them is less dangerous for the life, security and
future of Palestinians and Arabs!!
The
concept of ‘danger’ being promoted by anti-Arab propaganda is a racist concept par
excellence because it portrays every Arab as a source of danger, while
portraying occupation soldiers armed to the teeth and armed settlers expelling
Palestinians from their homes as fearful
for their lives. The pictures of
Palestinian prisoners tell numerous stories everyday about people uprooted from
their homes, blindfolded and pushed against the wall by a soldier who violates
all sanctities and all international laws and conventions. Nevertheless, the picture is accompanied by a
lie that he is fearful for his security and that his victims are the ones
threatening this security.
It
is within the perspective of dominating the earth that the settlement fever
swallows up the best of Palestinian land and is trying today to swallow up East
Jerusalem and the West Bank
in a flagrant process of Judaizing land and holy
shrines. It is also within this
framework that the visit of an American Senate delegation led by Senator Mike Huckabee
to Shepherd Hotel in Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood of East
Jerusalem in defiance of the nature and sanctity of
the place and absolute disregard to Palestinian rights in this city should be
viewed.
What is
more telling is that American donors who promote settlement in East Jerusalem
receive tax exemptions granted by the US government
to organizations which support “educational projects”! The Israeli daily Haaretz
pointed out that American friends of the itrit kohanim organization have raised millions of dollars in the
past few years in support of Judaizing East Jerusalem. And
here is Senator Huckabee holding a celebration in the
Shepherd Hotel in Sheikh Jarrah, which was
expropriated together with the land surrounding it by Israel
in 1968. Israel
recently started building twenty settlement units on this
site despite the protests of the international community.
Yet,
those who have fallen into the trap of the ‘covers’ fabricated by Israel for
its real activities and intentions speak of negotiations as the only way of
dealing with those who uproot them one after another, while perceiving those
with whom they share the same tragic destiny, as the only opponent.
For
those I say: did you read what Yediot Ahronot reported on August 9, 2009 that 66% of Israelis
consider their sovereignty over Jerusalem
un-negotiable and that it is Israel ’s right to build settlements wherever
it wanted? Is there anyone out there
reading the real language of “dominating the earth”? And does anyone remember that land is the
most precious thing that humans possess?
Has not land always been the cause of wars among people and the source
of their conflicts because it is the most precious thing they possess?